no_drama@swathi_ Well said. Then probably the person concerned have been coward and an escapist!! But in addition, there is room for a situation (supposingly) wherein both were unsatisfied as well as unhappy and thus looking for an alternate and the one who got it first took final step and vanished without consent.
no_dramaJust a thought! Not indulging in someone's personal life. Inconvenience regretted in case caused by words.
swathi_@no_drama Both, Unhappy and unsatisfied. Ah, no. One wasn't. It might be the case, for the other person, but it didn't seem so. Another good example, for " There's more than what meets the eye". Anyway, lessons learnt.
swathi_@no_drama Hey Abhishek, no inconvenience caused. In fact, I'm glad I saw it from a different perspective, now. I was avoiding this possibility before. Thanks to you !